This isn't the first time that you've offered court testimony in an
OUI case, is it?
You've received training in how to testify in court?
And you consider yourself a professional when it cones to
offering testimony in court?
When you arrested My Client on these charges, you knew there was
a chance you would be appearing as a witness against him at trial,
correct?
How many times have you testified in OUI trials?
Would it be fair to say that you've appeared as a witness for the
government in at least 50 OUI cases? 100 OUI cases?
Of all the people that you have arrested and testified against,
some of those people were found to be "not guilty" by a jury of
their peers, weren't they?
So you would agree that there is a difference between probably
cause to arrest and proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
